CI/CD & Release Engineering
Move changes reliably from commit to operations.
When builds, checks and deployments do not work together, releases become difficult to coordinate. We connect development, quality assurance, security and operations in a consistent delivery process. The aim is to move a verified software artifact through your environments with traceable approvals and a workable recovery path if deployment fails.
Service modules
Bringing quality, approvals, and operations together in one process.
Delivery flow and bottlenecks
We look at the path from change to use: waiting times, manual steps, test gaps and unclear handovers. Together, we define which checks are necessary and who decides on approvals or exceptions.
A coordinated release process with clear responsibilities and prioritized improvements.
Builds and release artifacts
We structure build environments, dependencies and artifact storage. Versions and provenance remain traceable. An approved artifact is promoted through the environments with a clear identity, instead of silently rebuilding it at each stage.
A traceable build process with uniquely assigned, reusable release artifacts.
Quality and security checks
Tests, dependency and vulnerability checks as well as agreed provenance evidence are sensibly arranged. Rules for dealing with findings, false alarms and exceptions are part of the process and have comprehensible responsibilities.
Binding test criteria with evaluable results and a regulated exemption path.
Pipeline access and approvals
We limit the permissions of pipeline jobs and separate access by task and environment. Secrets, workload identities and approvals are designed so that changes with a large impact receive appropriate review.
A verified permission and approval model for builds and deployments.
Rollout and recovery
We select appropriate deployment methods and define termination criteria. Rollback, forward correction and database changes are considered together; an earlier image alone is often not a sufficient way back when data structures have changed.
A tested rollout flow with health checks and appropriate recovery procedures.
Release records and improvement
Versions, changes, test results and deployment status are merged. We look at delivery times and error cases in the context of the team and use them to deal with bottlenecks in a targeted manner.
Usable release records and regular reviews to improve the delivery process.
Application examples
CI/CD & Release Engineering Use Cases
These exemplary starting points show possible projects. Together, we narrow down what makes sense for your organization.
Replace manual deployments
An application is published via individually executed steps. We make the process reproducible, integrate necessary tests and test release and error handling with a complete test release.
Reliably traversing multiple environments
Test and production use different artifacts or configurations. We separate the software version and environmental values, define transitions and make it visible for each stage which artifact is actually used.
Manage release risks for data changes
Application and database changes must be introduced together. We plan compatibility phases, checks, and recovery options in such a way that the business data requirements determine the release process.
Collaboration
Test the complete delivery process with a real release.
Review the current release process
We analyze repositories, pipelines, environments, and recurring bugs. A representative release path serves as a starting point for improvement.
Agree on checks and stage transitions
Together, we determine the artifact strategy, releases, accesses and termination criteria. Responsibility for each test result is expressly assigned.
Implement and test failure scenarios
We implement the agreed steps and, in addition to the case of success, also check failed tests, deployment aborts and the appropriate recovery path.
Hand over and improve using evidence
The team carries out the process itself. Release documentation, operational knowledge and key figures help to prioritize further improvements according to their actual benefit.
Your result
What you can use in concrete terms
- Versioned pipeline templates and a clearly traceable artifact strategy.
- Documented test criteria, approvals and rules for justified exceptions.
- Proven rollout, demolition, and recovery procedures.
- Release proofs and a prioritized improvement plan for the delivery process.
SYNEDAT PLATFORM
Platform experience for your project
We use these selected tools in SYNEDAT PLATFORM or its delivery processes. We adapt suitable practices to your project and align their integration with your existing systems.
From source code to verified artifacts
Azure DevOps · GitLab · Jenkins · Harbor · Nexus
Version control, build processes and artifact repositories make software versions traceable. Our platform approach connects these activities with defined checks and approvals. For your project, we select tools that fit your teams and existing processes.
A clear delivery process and traceable software versions.
Deployment and platform automation
Kubernetes · Azure Kubernetes Service · Helm · Argo CD · Terraform
Versioned configuration and declarative deployment connect infrastructure and applications. GitOps makes proposed changes reviewable and the desired state explicit. Operational transitions and recovery procedures are still planned for the specific application.
Repeatable changes and clearer responsibility boundaries.
Quality and the software supply chain
SonarQube · Trivy · Dependency-Track · DefectDojo · Renovate · Syft · Cosign
Code quality, vulnerabilities, dependencies and artifact provenance require different checks. Findings need to be linked to the product and delivered version, with a defined process for resolving them. Automated checks complement reviews and informed decisions.
Security and quality information that teams can act on.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we need to change the CI/CD tool for improvement?
Often, the existing platform can continue to be used. First, we check processes, authorizations, artifacts and tests. A tool change only becomes part of the project if the required functions or operating requirements cannot be meaningfully fulfilled with the existing system.
Does Continuous Delivery require automatic deployment to production?
Not necessarily. A tested, deployable software version can still require explicit production approval. We design the transition around your requirements for risk, ownership and release evidence.
How do you deal with security findings that block a release?
We agree on comprehensible rules for assessment, correction and time-limited exceptions. Responsibility, justification and resubmission are part of this. The goal is a resilient decision-making process in which audits and actual risks are assessed together.
Can database changes be included in the release process?
Yes. We examine migrations together with application versions, dependencies and available maintenance windows. Tests, backups and failure handling are defined for the specific case. Changes that could lose data require an explicit decision and an appropriate recovery approach.
What is included in handing over an improved pipeline?
Within the agreed scope, handover covers structure, permissions, approvals and common failure cases. Your team receives clear documentation and a practical introduction. Responsibilities for tools, updates and further changes are recorded.
Your next step
At what point will your next release be difficult?
Describe your current delivery journey and the most common obstacles. We explain how a representative release process can be improved and tested with your team.
CI/CD & Release Engineering
Your next step
Tell us what you need. We will route your enquiry to the right team and discuss the next steps with you.
Fields marked * are required. Phone, company and postal address are optional.