Managed patch & vulnerability management
From known vulnerabilities to verified measures.
Vulnerability lists and pending updates need a process that turns findings into improvements. We combine the agreed assessment with prioritization, maintenance planning and verification. System owners, affected applications and operational dependencies remain visible, helping you address relevant risks and introduce changes in a controlled way.
Your options
Services that move your project forward
Define systems and responsibilities
We record the agreed devices, servers, applications and technical managers. Supported platforms, access and existing tools determine the possible processing.
A clear service scope establishes realistic expectations.
Assess and prioritize findings
Scan results and vendor information are assessed against exposure, actual use and business impact. Technical severity and operational context both inform priority.
The next measures are based on relevant risks.
Schedule updates and changes
We agree dependencies, approvals, maintenance windows and test groups before implementation. Rollback options and required support are included in the plan.
Changes become easier for the affected teams to plan.
Carry out measures in a controlled manner
Commissioned updates and configuration measures are implemented in suitable groups. Installation status, errors and necessary rework are recorded in a comprehensible manner.
See what has been implemented and what still needs attention.
Check effectiveness and exceptions
Appropriate follow-up checks show whether a finding has been remedied. Measures that cannot be implemented are given a documented reason, a person responsible and a date for re-evaluation.
Residual tasks and accepted exceptions remain visible.
Improve reporting and workflows
Recurring errors, long lead times and lack of responsibilities are discussed. Findings from tools such as Trivy and Dependency-Track are incorporated where software supply chains belong to the agreed scope.
The process improves based on specific findings and processing results.
Where to start
Managed patch & vulnerability management Use cases
Three example situations show how we can help.
Updates are postponed again and again
We combine technical requirements, maintenance windows and approvals into a repeatable process.
Vulnerability lists are too long for the available team
Contextual prioritization helps to distinguish relevant measures and justified exceptions.
Several service providers work on different systems
Joint handovers and status information make open tasks and responsibilities traceable.
From requirements to results
A clear process with agreed milestones
Review systems and existing procedures
Systems, tools, previous findings and change processes are recorded.
Agree on priorities and scope of services
We define responsibilities for assessment, approvals, maintenance windows and evidence of completed work.
Run a pilot and initial remediation
A limited scope verifies installation, troubleshooting, rollback and the evidence needed to confirm results.
Establish regular operation and reviews
Recurring processing, exceptions and improvements are given clear responsibilities.
Your benefit
What you receive
- An agreed system scope with prioritization and processing rules.
- Documented maintenance planning, changes and implementation results.
- Evidence of verified remediation and a documented exception register.
- Regular reports with relevant open tasks and improvements.
Ways to work with us
Choose a starting point that fits your needs. We agree the scope and required effort in a tailored proposal.
Patch and vulnerability assessment
To get started: system scope, procedures and prioritized fields of action.
Request a quote: Patch and vulnerability assessmentOngoing support for defined system groups
For regular operation: coordinated maintenance, documented measures and follow-up inspection.
Request a quote: Ongoing support for defined system groupsImprove workflows and software supply chains
For more complex environments: shared processes between IT operations, development, and security leaders.
Request a quote: Improve workflows and software supply chainsSYNEDAT PLATFORM
Platform experience for your project
We use these selected tools in SYNEDAT PLATFORM or its delivery processes. We adapt suitable practices to your project and align their integration with your existing systems.
From source code to verified artifacts
Azure DevOps · GitLab · Jenkins · Harbor · Nexus
Version control, build processes and artifact repositories make software versions traceable. Our platform approach connects these activities with defined checks and approvals. For your project, we select tools that fit your teams and existing processes.
A clear delivery process and traceable software versions.
Quality and the software supply chain
SonarQube · Trivy · Dependency-Track · DefectDojo · Renovate · Syft · Cosign
Code quality, vulnerabilities, dependencies and artifact provenance require different checks. Findings need to be linked to the product and delivered version, with a defined process for resolving them. Automated checks complement reviews and informed decisions.
Security and quality information that teams can act on.
Questions before you get started
Are vulnerability scanning and patching the same service?
A scan provides indications of possible vulnerabilities. The assessment and remediation also require system knowledge, approvals and appropriate measures. We expressly describe which steps are part of the commissioned service.
Is every finding automatically corrected immediately?
Processing follows agreed priorities and operational requirements. An update may require testing, approvals, or application customization. Urgent findings are handled according to the agreed escalation procedure.
What role does technical severity play?
Technical severity is considered alongside exposure, usage, protection needs and available remedies. This establishes priorities relevant to your environment. A score alone does not replace an informed assessment.
What happens if a patch is not yet available?
Suitable alternative measures can be examined, such as limited accessibility or an adapted configuration. Responsible persons decide on the specific implementation and remaining risks. The exemption will be reassessed as soon as the situation changes.
How will impact on applications be limited?
Test groups, dependency checks, maintenance windows and rollback options form part of the process. Verification depth depends on the system and change. The responsible teams agree tests of business functionality.
Can you manage endpoints and servers together?
Yes, if the platforms and tools used fit the agreed model. Procedures, approvals and maintenance windows may differ. The scope of services specifies the respective system groups and responsibilities.
Are containers and application dependencies included?
They can be considered as a separate scope. A detected library vulnerability may require a new build, application tests, and deployment. The interface to the development team is therefore explicitly clarified.
How do you prove completed measures?
We combine installation status, documented changes and appropriate follow-up checks. A successful update does not by itself verify every business function. The service defines the scope and limits of the evidence provided.
Discuss your next step
Which open measures are slowing down your risk reduction?
Describe your system groups and current remediation workflow. We will propose a defined starting point for ongoing support.
Managed patch & vulnerability management
Your next step
Tell us what you need. We will route your enquiry to the right team and discuss the next steps with you.
Fields marked * are required. Phone, company and postal address are optional.